This is why Halsey is going federal.

“If justice cannot be found in Beverly Hills or Los Angeles, it will be found at the Federal level. The status quo is not acceptable for anyone. It has been allowed to persist far too long. Watch this page.”

Halsey Minor · October 24, 2026

Los Angeles County and Beverly Hills, measured not by him but by others: the Department of Justice, the State Auditor, the County's own lawyers, the departments' own reports and independent researchers.

Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California, in his official portrait.
“The ninth annual RIPA report reflects California’s tireless dedication to addressing racial and identity bias in policing.”
Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California · January 30, 2026, on the state’s report on 2024 police stops · Source

Beverly Hills · its police · 2024

7.0× Black people were stopped at 7.0 times the rate of white people, measured against each group's residents.

White people (the base)1×
Black people7.0×

10,293 stops recorded in 2024.

Every figure
Black / white resident-based stop-rate ratio7.0
Stops recorded10,293

Newspaper analysis of state data · San Francisco Chronicle · Source

Secondary calculation, not an institution-published ratio. Visitor/commuter exposure mismatch; cannot read as individual stop probability or proof of discrimination.

Beverly Hills · its city government

  1. 2024Beverly Hills city government. California DOJ investigation of obstruction of a reproductive-health clinic. Negotiated remedies; no trial, admission or adjudication of facts. Source

Los Angeles: the District Attorney and the agencies around it

The County, its Sheriff's Department and the Los Angeles Police Department.

25 of 25Sheriff's concealed-weapon license files where proper issuance could not be shown, 2017 audit
54.4%of rapes reported to the Sheriff's Department cleared by exceptional clearance, which is not an arrest, 2005–2009
$40.1Min Sheriff's excessive-force litigation in one year, fiscal 2024–25
$229.3Min County litigation in one year, fiscal 2024–25
1,625federal public-corruption convictions in the district that includes Los Angeles, 1976–2021

The Sheriff's Department and LAPD · rapes and attempted rapes reported, 2005 to 2009

54.4%

of the 2,269 reported to the Sheriff's Department were cleared by exceptional clearance, which is not an arrest. LAPD cleared 12.2% of 5,031 by arrest.

  • Arrest clearance
  • Exceptional clearance, which is not an arrest
  • Investigation continuing
  • Unfounded

Sheriff's Department · 2,269 cases

33.9%54.4%

LAPD · 5,031 cases

12.2%33.5%43.4%
Every figure
LAPD · Arrest clearance12.2%of 5,031 reported
LAPD · Exceptional clearance33.5%of 5,031 reported
LAPD · Total clearance45.7%of 5,031 reported
LAPD · Investigation continuing43.4%of 5,031 reported
LAPD · Unfounded10.9%of 5,031 reported
Sheriff's Department · Arrest clearance33.9%of 2,269 reported
Sheriff's Department · Exceptional clearance54.4%of 2,269 reported
Sheriff's Department · Total clearance88.3%of 2,269 reported
Sheriff's Department · Investigation continuing10.6%of 2,269 reported
Sheriff's Department · Unfounded1.1%of 2,269 reported

Independent study, historical · Spohn & Tellis / ASU and CSU Los Angeles · Source

Historical descriptive data, not current performance; exceptional clearance is not arrest or conviction. Use Chapter II cohort consistently; later study chapter has a different LASD cohort.

Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department · concealed-weapon licenses, audited 2017

25 of 25

license files the State Auditor selected, and in every one the department could not demonstrate proper issuance.

Could not demonstrate proper issuance 25 of 25

Applicant had a law enforcement community occupation 22 of 25

No documentation of specific personal threats 14 of 25

Applicant did not identify a specific personal threat 10 of 25

Active licenses held outside the law enforcement community, August 20179 of 197
Every figure
Could not demonstrate proper issuance25of 25 files
No documentation of specific personal threats14of 25 files
Applicant did not identify a specific personal threat10of 25 files
Applicant had a law enforcement community occupation22of 25 files
Active CCW licenses outside law enforcement community9of 197 active licenses, August 2017
All active CCW licenses197August 2017

External government audit · California State Auditor · Source

Selected files; overlapping findings; audit concerns historical policy and documentation, not proof each license was unlawful or a present-day approval rate.

Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department · excessive-force litigation

$40.1M

in one year, fiscal 2024–25, up from $14.5M in 2021–22. 147 excessive-force lawsuits defended.

$14.5M2021–22
$34.1M2022–23
$21.3M2023–24
$40.1M2024–25
Every figure
Excessive-force litigation total expenses · FY 2021–22$14,500,000
Excessive-force litigation total expenses · FY 2022–23$34,100,000
Excessive-force litigation total expenses · FY 2023–24$21,343,366
Excessive-force litigation total expenses · FY 2024–25$40,050,012
FY 2024–25 excessive-force expense components · Judgments and settlements$30,156,531
FY 2024–25 excessive-force expense components · Fees and costs$9,893,481
Excessive-force lawsuits defended · FY 2024–25147

County self-report: the County's own lawyers · Los Angeles County Counsel · Source

Includes judgments, settlements, fees and costs; payments can lag incidents. Fiscal-year expense is not incident prevalence or lawsuits lost.

Los Angeles County · all litigation, fiscal 2024–25

$229.3M

in one year. 290 lawsuits settled; 18 judgments paid.

  • Settlements
  • Judgments
  • Attorney fees and costs

Fiscal 2024–25 · $229.3M in all

$87.0M$31.0M$111.3M
Every figure
Litigation spending · Judgments$30,971,954
Litigation spending · Settlements$87,029,972
Litigation spending · Attorney fees and costs$111,264,378
Litigation spending · Total litigation expenses$229,266,304
Disposition counts paid in fiscal year · Judgments paid18
Disposition counts paid in fiscal year · Lawsuits settled290

County self-report: the County's own lawyers · Los Angeles County Counsel · Source

All County departments and case types; defense costs are not damages, settlements are not findings of liability. Total includes the three components; do not sum total again.

Los Angeles Police Department · homicides of 2025 cleared, by the victim

54%

of homicides with Black victims cleared (49 of 91), against 80% with white victims (28 of 35).

Black victims54%
Hispanic victims77%
White victims80%
Asian victims, 4 cases50%
Other, 5 cases80%
Every figure
Asian50%2 of 4
Black54%49 of 91
Hispanic77%73 of 95
White80%28 of 35
Other80%4 of 5
All victims68%156 of 230

Department self-report · Los Angeles Police Department · Source

Unadjusted agency report; small categories unstable; clearance is not conviction or proof of discriminatory cause.

Los Angeles Police Department · its headline homicide clearance rate, 2025

101%

counts 76 older cases. Of the 230 homicides of 2025, 156 were cleared: 68%.

The headline rate101%
Homicides of 2025 cleared68%
Every figure
Headline annual clearance rate101%
Prior-year homicides cleared in 202576
2025 homicide cohort clearance68%

Department self-report · Los Angeles Police Department · Source

Different cohort; source reports 76 prior-year clearances. Rounded 101% is not the proportion of 2025 homicides cleared.

Found by their own overseers

  1. April 2025LASD · civilian oversight. The Civilian Oversight Commission tracked 27 deputy-gang/clique recommendations; four had been rejected by the Sheriff and several others remained partial or unimplemented. Commission implementation assessment, not a count of active deputy gangs. Source
  2. 2017–18 · reviewed 2025LAPD · sexual-assault investigative information. City police inspector general reviewed safeguards after reported sharing of confidential investigation information with the personnel of a high-profile subject. Oversight review; January 2026 addendum corrected recipient and officer role, without changing findings. Source
  3. December 2025LASD · Antelope Valley monitors. Substantial progress and compliance with most provisions; remaining policy, training, data and durability gaps. Independent monitoring assessment; improvement included. Source

The federal government has stepped in here before

The United States Department of Justice, against the Los Angeles agencies, and the federal courts.

Federal public-corruption convictions, by federal district, 1976 to 2021

1,625

in the district of Central California, which includes Los Angeles: second only to Northern Illinois.

Northern Illinois1,824
Central California, which includes Los Angeles1,625
Southern New York1,387
Every figure
Northern Illinois1,824
Central California1,625
Southern New York1,387

University study of federal data · University of Illinois Chicago · Source

Absolute convictions in federal districts; not population adjusted, underlying corruption prevalence, or a city/county justice ranking. Three highest districts in source table.

The United States Department of Justice

  1. 2015U.S. Department of Justice Los Angeles County jails. Suicide risks, inadequate mental-health care and excessive force. Federal settlement requiring reforms. Source
  2. 2013 → 2015U.S. Department of Justice LASD · Antelope Valley. DOJ findings on unconstitutional policing and discrimination in housing-related enforcement. Federal settlement in 2015. Source
  3. 2000U.S. Department of Justice LAPD. DOJ pattern-or-practice claims: excessive force, false arrests, unlawful searches and seizures. Consent-decree agreement announced. Source

Compiled in October 2026 from the publications linked above, and checked against each of them on October 2, 2026. Each measure stands on its own source: no score and no ranking. The State Bar is not included.